Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 3:03:44 GMT -6
is an example of the lack of understanding that our politics suffers, the origin and cause of dissension and misunderstandings between politicians and parties, a situation that makes them unable to understand and comprehend each other; They are responsible for the loss of opportunities to go, “all together” in the pursuit of those interests that matter to the majority of citizens; “Babel” is an image and a system of seeing, analyzing and describing the reality of our current politics. The effort to understand and understand how politicians act, instead of clarity and confidence, generates confusion and insecurity in the citizen: they use the same or similar words and meanings, but their meanings express very different realities; They pronounce the signifiers not.
With univocal values but with equivocal, ambiguous or contrary values, producing a biased and distorted vision of the thought and description of the reality that they try to explain, they do not demonstrate any interest in the truth, but rather " in their truth." How do we know that the words a Australia Phone Number politician speaks or writes mean the same thing in the minds of those who listen or read him? The Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure said that between the signifier and the meaning of words there is no necessary correspondence; Their relationship is conventional, arbitrary; Roland Barthes, the French critical philosopher and semiologist, added that the link between the signifier and the signified is contractual in its beginning, but that contract is collective, it is inscribed in a temporality long of centuries and consequently and.
Certain way, it comes to become naturalized so that, for that reason, we are able to understand each other, hence, with the beauty of synthesis, Saussure repeated: “language is always an inheritance”, an inheritance that we must know how to manage without traps or deceptions. . The Argentine philosopher Ernest Laclau added, for his part, that there are empty signifiers ; Empty is one to which no specific meaning corresponds. The existence of a signifier does not mean that there is a precise and univocal meaning, but rather, since there is not a single meaning for the signifier, a void is constituted that, instead of turning it into a meaningless sound, contains something positive, since such Significant can have a range of possibilities that do not admit closure, depending on how it is interpreted.
With univocal values but with equivocal, ambiguous or contrary values, producing a biased and distorted vision of the thought and description of the reality that they try to explain, they do not demonstrate any interest in the truth, but rather " in their truth." How do we know that the words a Australia Phone Number politician speaks or writes mean the same thing in the minds of those who listen or read him? The Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure said that between the signifier and the meaning of words there is no necessary correspondence; Their relationship is conventional, arbitrary; Roland Barthes, the French critical philosopher and semiologist, added that the link between the signifier and the signified is contractual in its beginning, but that contract is collective, it is inscribed in a temporality long of centuries and consequently and.
Certain way, it comes to become naturalized so that, for that reason, we are able to understand each other, hence, with the beauty of synthesis, Saussure repeated: “language is always an inheritance”, an inheritance that we must know how to manage without traps or deceptions. . The Argentine philosopher Ernest Laclau added, for his part, that there are empty signifiers ; Empty is one to which no specific meaning corresponds. The existence of a signifier does not mean that there is a precise and univocal meaning, but rather, since there is not a single meaning for the signifier, a void is constituted that, instead of turning it into a meaningless sound, contains something positive, since such Significant can have a range of possibilities that do not admit closure, depending on how it is interpreted.
