Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 1:04:00 GMT -6
The Popular Party now says that it is not going to change its headquarters at Génova 13 despite the fact that, at the time, and as a symbol that they were beginning a new stage without corruption, they announced that they would get rid of that building. And the fact is that this announcement had a certain redeeming logic since it was shown that, in Génova 13, irregularly financed renovation works had been carried out. Therefore, although, as they now say in the PP, buildings are not to blame for anything, they can be a symbol of something. And, in this case, the first thing that Génova 13 symbolizes is that the PP did not have the slightest problem in spending the opaque funds it obtained on something as visible as its own headquarters building. It is something like an ostentation of impunity in an application of the first rule of sleight of hand, which is to do the trick in public view. But, once that party had to accept that its corruption was not only notorious but also convicted and caused the loss of political power, it confessed it by announcing the sale of its headquarters in a kind of penance with which it hoped to obtain forgiveness. of his conduct.
Following the steps of a good confession, it was necessary to interpret that these chest beats would inevitably be followed by a firm purpose for amendment that would redeem the Popular Party from its darkest past and open a new path based on repentance. But the only thing they seem to have regretted is selling their Australia Phone Number headquarters. After two cases of purchases, let's say surprising, of masks in the City Council and in the Community of Madrid , in the Popular Party the waters have returned to normal, although in this case it could be waters with an appreciable degree of turbidity. Recent resume of José Luis Martínez-Almeida Navasqüés And, with this twist of script they also symbolize the end of a stage in which, it is possible, they tried to separate themselves from corruption. Perhaps with signs as naive as changing headquarters or investigating, in the manner of Mortadelo and Filemón, possible corruption in the Community of Madrid.
But, as the end of that stage, there is no doubt that removing the leader who publicized suspicions about him and maintaining the old symbol of corruption could, in turn, be symbols of something. Of course, there are those who may consider the very fact of not fulfilling a commitment a symbol of the volatility of words in politics. Because the true meaning of the explanation they just gave for not complying with what they said is that "those who were before" had said that. Thus, any offer made by a political party can come to nothing simply by changing the spokesperson for that advertisement. And, that, along with the idea that, in reality, people have no memory, can also symbolize the little respect that some feel for the people for whom they say they stay up late. Unless, indeed, they know that the public, their audience, ignores the topic. In which case, I'm not very sure that, as they have now said, if "the building belongs to their members," they are not making them complicit in the story. But, given the firmness of the intentions that that party usually announces, today, as Ibáñez Serrador would say, they are not selling Génova 13, but tomorrow.
Following the steps of a good confession, it was necessary to interpret that these chest beats would inevitably be followed by a firm purpose for amendment that would redeem the Popular Party from its darkest past and open a new path based on repentance. But the only thing they seem to have regretted is selling their Australia Phone Number headquarters. After two cases of purchases, let's say surprising, of masks in the City Council and in the Community of Madrid , in the Popular Party the waters have returned to normal, although in this case it could be waters with an appreciable degree of turbidity. Recent resume of José Luis Martínez-Almeida Navasqüés And, with this twist of script they also symbolize the end of a stage in which, it is possible, they tried to separate themselves from corruption. Perhaps with signs as naive as changing headquarters or investigating, in the manner of Mortadelo and Filemón, possible corruption in the Community of Madrid.
But, as the end of that stage, there is no doubt that removing the leader who publicized suspicions about him and maintaining the old symbol of corruption could, in turn, be symbols of something. Of course, there are those who may consider the very fact of not fulfilling a commitment a symbol of the volatility of words in politics. Because the true meaning of the explanation they just gave for not complying with what they said is that "those who were before" had said that. Thus, any offer made by a political party can come to nothing simply by changing the spokesperson for that advertisement. And, that, along with the idea that, in reality, people have no memory, can also symbolize the little respect that some feel for the people for whom they say they stay up late. Unless, indeed, they know that the public, their audience, ignores the topic. In which case, I'm not very sure that, as they have now said, if "the building belongs to their members," they are not making them complicit in the story. But, given the firmness of the intentions that that party usually announces, today, as Ibáñez Serrador would say, they are not selling Génova 13, but tomorrow.
